One week in your code: a fix list ranked by cost, a rewrite-or-refactor verdict, and the top fix as a pull request. $997, one payment.
Changes touch files nobody meant to touch, and fixed bugs come back.
A rewrite, a new platform, a jump in users. Will the base hold?
Read the caseWhat's load-bearing, and what is safe to touch?
Every feature works alone. Does the whole hang together?
Every finding comes with its fix. These rows are my own mistakes and one review.
Also in the report: a rewrite-or-refactor verdict with each path's cost in weeks, and one page in business terms.
One week from access to the report. Your team keeps shipping.
I trace the slowest change and the bug that keeps coming back
Findings ranked by cost, each with file, fix and effort in days
Stop, or keep me on by the week to work down the list
Product teams with a roadmap that keeps slipping.
Right For
Better Elsewhere
A simple, predictable and transparent process that eliminates development headaches.
Pay once and you get a dedicated task board. The audit is its first task.
Read access to the repo, hosting and logs, and a branch I can push the fix to.
The ranked list becomes your task list. You decide how far down I go.
You review the report and the pull request. I revise until you're satisfied.
You approve the report. If you keep me on, I take the next item.
If you keep me on, issues you report go first.
One week in your code, and the report.
— 1-week delivery
A senior second opinion, with the top fix shipped.
A software architecture review that ends in a ranked fix list and a pull request, not a call and a diagram. It doubles as a code audit and a tech debt assessment.
$997, one payment: one week, report included. No contract.
Six areas, in the order they hurt: structure, data model, failure handling, scale and cost, security at the seams, continuity.
Run one first: it catches local issues. It can't tell which module next quarter's roadmap will hit, or what has failed in production before.
Usually refactor: a rewrite costs most in the freeze. When a rebuild is honest, it runs beside the old app, as it did for 8 months.
JavaScript and TypeScript only, on the default stack. Other stacks: I say no rather than learn on your dime.
Keep me on by the week and I work down the list, one task at a time. Or hand it to any developer: it's written for them.
I revise the report until you're satisfied.
Fill in the project form and name the change that hurts most. I reply the next working day; if it fits, with a first plan and a call invite.
Jurij understand the core problem, insists on building the right experiences for the customers.
Kunal Modi
Founder @ SOAPNoteAI
Working with Jurij is an absolute joy, consistently exceeds expectations.
Janis Ozolins
Content Creator
Consistently delivered quality code in great time, very hard working & precise.
Bartosz Poźniak
CEO @ MyCointainer
The kind of engineer that every company on the planet would be lucky to have.
Hosam Mazawi
COO @ LemonUnit
Architecture Audit fits product teams best: CTOs and tech leads who need a senior on one part of the product.
“The upgrade keeps losing to features”: small pull requests, no big-bang rewrite.
“Backend work waits on a hire”: endpoints, integrations, an API being retired.
“Nobody here has shipped an LLM feature”: a prototype on your data first.
“Our workflows have no owner”: new flows, code where nodes stop, monitoring.
“An old app still has users and no owner”: kept current and safe.
“The bill keeps rising, or nobody trusts the rules”: the bill tied to its code, every rule reviewed.
“Releases are slow and scary”: planning to monitoring, fixes ranked.
Architecture Audit
“Every feature takes longer than the last”: why, what to fix first, whether a rewrite pays.
Not on a product team? See what Varstatt offers you.
Sole proprietorship headquartered in Rzeszów, Poland. VAT ID: PL8133854722.
